Skip to Content AEE - Advances in Engineering Education - A Journal of Engineering Education Applications HomeGuide for AuthorsMission & VisionArchiveContact ASEE - American Society for Engineering Education
AEE - Advances in Engineering Education - A Journal of Engineering Education Applications
Search
Past Issue: Winter 2009 Volume 1 | Number 3
Welcome
Current Issue: Spring 2009
Archive
Spring 2009
Winter 2009
From the Editor
From Tootsie Rolls to Broken Bones: An Innovative Approach for Active Learning in Mechanics of Materials
Implementing and Assessing the Converging-Diverging Model of Design in a Sequence of Sophomore Projects
A Thermal Management of Electronics Course and Laboratory for Undergraduates
Using Concept Maps to Assess Interdisciplinary Integration of Green Engineering Knowledge
Blended Teaching and Learning of Computer Programming Skills in Engineering Curricula
A Model for Freshman Engineering Retention
Summer 2008
Fall 2007
Editor's Message
Guide for Authors
Mission & Vision
Associate Editors
Advisory Board
Contact
ASEE
Advances in Engineering Education - Winter 2009 | Volume 1 | Issue 3

Using Concept Maps to Assess Interdisciplinary Integration of Green Engineering Knowledge

View Full Text
PDF: 871KB
MAURA BORREGO
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

CHAD B. NEWSWANDER
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

LISA D. McNAIR
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

SEAN McGINNIS
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

MARIE C. PARETTI
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

ABSTRACT

Engineering education, like many fields, has started to explore the benefits of concept maps as an assessment technique for knowledge integration. Because they allow students to graphically link topics and represent complex interconnections among diverse concepts, we argue that concept maps are particularly appropriate for assessing interdisciplinary knowledge integration. The results from a year-long study of a design course in green engineering demonstrate the viability of this approach. However, this research also highlights important issues in faculty scoring of interdisciplinary concept maps that may not be present when maps are used in traditional single-discipline settings. The interdisciplinary setting revealed differences in (1) evaluation criteria, (2) expertise, and (3) investment. We conclude with suggestions for selecting and training scorers to address these issues.

Keywords: assessment, concept maps, green engineering, interdisciplinary

FULL TEXT

View Full Text
PDF: 871KB

TOPˆ


SPONSORED LINKS
ADVERTISE AT ASEE